Essay about Reflection on Machiavelli - 919 Words

Machiavelli was born on May 3, 1469 in Florence, Italy. Florence was considered one of the most dominant Italian power to conquer. It was the main attraction for the renaissances influences. Throughout the years, Machiavellis presence was around the time that both the French and Spanish armies were fighting over the control of Italy. During this time, Italy was falling apart because it was deficient in leadership. Machiavelli served 14 years as Chancellor of Florence before he was exiled in 1513. The Republic had fallen and the Medicis returned in power. While in exile, Machiavelli knew the world was changing and becoming more chaotic; he wrote the book The Prince. The Prince was written to emphasize his thoughts that Italy was on†¦show more content†¦There are no limits to moral values because it is human to do wrong. People cannot be trusted and they will backstab, therefore, being a Prince, a leader, and not recognizing that evil is in human, and not taking into account that fear must be inspired in order to stay in power of the state and its security, failure would be the result. That being said, I think it is best known that the most merciless are the ones in power. If a leader wants power, the leader must play by those rules, or else the leader also affects the people. However, the leader cannot have the people turned against him; feared, but not despised. Being a leader is only accomplished by understanding what is and is not needed. A leader standing by their words shows loyalty, but it must be understood when to lie. Execution is not necessary, but realize that at times it might be. A leader should show goodness and nobility, but break if it is a must. To my point of view, this tells how a leader has to do what is necessary to succeed. These are one of the many examples that still applies to the world today. I agree that today is nothing like the early 16th century but the world does share similar qualities and that is the fact that there are parts of the world chaotic as back then. I also agree that each person has their own opinion about Machiavellis thoughts. But Machiavellis purpose cannot be ignored. WeShow MoreRelatedMachiavelli In American Politics934 Words   |  4 PagesMachiavelli In American Politics In his landmark political treatise The Prince, Italian diplomat Niccolo Machiavelli put forth a framework for ruling a people that is at once derided and deferred to even today. The highly controversial ideology calls for a firm, even ruthless form of leadership that commands respect through any means necessary. Machiavelli allows even for the use of fear, violence and evil where appropriate. But it is in defining where these tactics are appropriate that we enterRead MoreSocrates And Machiavelli1660 Words   |  7 PagesThe works of Socrates and Machiavelli are as polarized as the phrases â€Å"the unexamined life is not worth living† and â€Å"the ends justify the means.† The Prince by Machiavelli and The Last Days of Socrates by Plato are both crucial texts to the discussion of what makes a good political leader. Well, what makes a good political leader? Socrates would disagree with Machiavelli’s ideation of the Prince because of the immorality that he allows this model to have in the public sphere. However, Socrates wouldRead MoreSir Thomas More s Utopia And Niccolo Machiavelli s The Prince1454 Words   |  6 PagesSir Thomas More’s Utopia and Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince reflect the ideals of the Renaissance. Their reflections of the Renaissance are similar; however, their representations of the Renaissance also have distinct differences. The Renaissance or â€Å"rebirth† was a cultural movement that accompanied the passage of Europe from the Middle Ages to modern times. Niccolo Machiavelli was an Italian civic humanist, historian, diplomat, philosopher, politician, and writer during the Renaissance. He appliedRead MoreEssay on Machiavellis The Prince: Politics, War, and Human Nature1334 Words   |  6 PagesMachiavellis The Prince: Politics, War, and Human Nature [I]t is necessary for a prince to know well how to use the beast and the man. (Machiavelli, The Prince, p. 69[1]). In this swift blow, Niccolà ² Machiavelli seems to strike down many visions of morality put up on pedestals by thinkers before his time. He doesnt turn to God or to some sort of common good for his political morality. Instead, he turns to the individual?more specifically, self-preservation in a position ofRead MoreThe Human Nature Of The Prince, Thomas Hobbes And James Madison1447 Words   |  6 PagesActions, whether they are good or bad, also derive from our most inner thoughts. The question now is what type of reasoning is natural to us all? This human nature is a topic explored by thinkers such as Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan, Niccollà ² Machiavelli in The Prince, Thomas Hobbes and James Madison in The Essential Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. Human nature is the force that pushes an individual to his or her actions. Political theory, as a resu lt, is shaped around this nature for theRead MoreA Comparison Of The Apology And Niccolo Machiavelli And The Prince1513 Words   |  7 Pagesphilosopher and teacher, views the individual as a sacred and beautiful being capable of reason and great wisdom while Machiavelli believes that the people are inferior to their leaders and require forceful leadership to order their lives. These fundamental opinions can be seen across the works of these men. Socrates’s view of humans will lead him to assert the importance of self-reflection and the people in effective government, while Machiavelli’s will cause him to value strength and violence. SocratesRead MoreComparing Nicolo Machiavelli s The Prince1014 Words   |  5 PagesWhile the human race is incredibly diverse and expansive, many writers and philosophers work to find common characteristics that they can attribute to what is typically referred to as human nature. Nicolo Machiavelli provides his beliefs on human nature i n his text, The Prince. While this work mostly surrounds the proper way to lead a princedom, there are many parts of the text that show how human nature affects the way a prince should rule his people. The examples of princes having to work aroundRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s The Prince And Julius Caesar1317 Words   |  6 PagesTexts are a reflection of its contextual values; it is evident that aspects of human nature remain constant irrespective of context. Texts ruminative of this include Tim Parks’ translation of Niccolo Machiavelli’s ‘The Prince’ (1532) and William Shakespeare’s historical tragedy ‘Julius Caesar’ (1599). The values and attitudes of these two texts anticipated responders and influenced purpose, form and content such as the darker aspects of humanism, the changeless nature of man, and the fickle natureRead MoreWhat Makes A Leader?1131 Words   |  5 Pagestimes, Plato, Machiavelli, and Marcus Aurelius. These leade rs aren’t at all from the same era, Plato was about 400 BC, Marcus about 200 common era, and Machiavelli about 1450 AD. These leaders all have different leading methods and show them through their writings. Of these three leaders I believe Marcus Aurelius is the better leader of the three. Marcus just like Machiavelli was an actually leader. Their ideas are is it better to be feared or love? Marcus thinks love, well Machiavelli thinks fearedRead MoreWhen the Ends Justify the Means in Machiavelli ´s The Prince Essay788 Words   |  4 Pagestailored toward the common good of the people rather than himself, then that ruler is worthy of occupying the status of authority. By acting in accordance with social and ethical norms, the ruler is deemed worthy of respect and authority. Niccolà ² Machiavelli challenges our moral intuitions about moral authority in his work, the Prince, by ruthlessly defending the actions made by the state in an effort to preserve power. In particular, all actions made by the state are done in order to preserve its power